The U.S. Departments of Justice and Education have withdrawn existing guidance on transgender students and issued a new Dear Colleague Letter calling into question whether Title IX requires that schools permit students to use restroom and locker room facilities aligned with their gender identity. The government informed schools that the withdrawn guidance does not contain extensive legal support for the position that Title IX's prohibition against discrimination on the basis of sex extends to access to sex-segregated facilities based on gender identity. The Department of Justice and Department of Education emphasized that states and local school districts should have a primary role in establishing educational policy.
Following the government's apparent shift in its interpretation of Title IX with regard to gender identity, the U.S. Supreme Court remanded for further consideration the issue of whether Title IX's prohibition of sex discrimination extends to discrimination based on gender identity. The case before the Court was filed by a transgender teen who asserts a right to use the boys' restroom at his high school. In siding with the teen, the Fourth Circuit relied heavily on the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights' (OCR) position that if a school separates student restrooms and locker rooms on the basis of sex, the school generally must treat transgender students in a manner consistent with their gender identity. The government's revocation of its key guidance documents espousing this position calls into question the foundation of the Fourth Circuit's decision.
Though both parties asked that the Supreme Court move forward with the case, the Court vacated the Fourth Circuit's decision and remanded for reconsideration in light of the changed guidance.
The actions by the government and the Court have raised questions for schools across the country about the status of existing policies, practices, and protections; the impact of state laws and related rulings by federal courts; the status of other related OCR guidance on gender identity; and implications for gender identity issues and transgender students on campus. Ballard Spahr will host a webinar to discuss these and related issues on March 16, 2017. Click here to register.
Attorneys in Ballard Spahr's Higher Education Practice Group regularly advise clients on Title IX compliance, conduct Title IX investigations and trainings, and audit Title IX policies and procedures.
Ballard Spahr's Consumer Financial Services Group is nationally recognized for its experience with the full range of federal and state consumer credit laws, its skill in litigation defense and avoidance, and its guidance in structuring and documenting new consumer financial services products. The firm's Higher Education Group regularly advises educational institutions on compliance with applicable laws.
Copyright © 2017 by Ballard Spahr LLP.
(No claim to original U.S. government material.)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the author and publisher.
This alert is a periodic publication of Ballard Spahr LLP and is intended to notify recipients of new developments in the law. It should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general informational purposes only, and you are urged to consult your own attorney concerning your situation and specific legal questions you have.